Chad Cook discusses how founders can define an ideal client profile and build human-centered technology before expanding an AI product roadmap.

Chad Cook — ICP Before Roadmap: Build Your Ideal Client Profile Before the Product Roadmap | CYOG Episode 06


Chad Cook — Build Your Ideal Client Profile Before the Product Roadmap | CYOG Episode 06

Most technology does not fail because the code is impossible.

It fails because nobody stopped long enough to ask who the code was for, who is this ideal client?

That is the tension inside this Create Your Own Gravity conversation with Chad Cook. A founder can build something technically impressive and still miss the people, business, and problem that would make it matter. Human-centered technology begins before the roadmap—before the feature list, before the pitch, and sometimes before the first line of code.

Who was in the room

Learn more about the guests: Chad Cook — LinkedIn · Chad Cook — Echelix

Joe Moore and Katrena Drake hosted the conversation, with Jeff Valin helping hold the technical room together and Chad Cook joining as the featured guest.

Chad brings experience as a product owner and technologist, along with a background in psychology and sociology. His perspective is useful because he does not treat technology as an isolated technical exercise. He sees it as a service industry—one that has to understand the business, the people inside it, and the decisions that determine whether a product survives contact with the real world.

The question beneath the conversation

How do you build something people actually need without becoming so attached to the thing you are building that you stop listening?

That question reaches beyond product development. It touches ego, courage, customer discovery, trust, money, and the difference between having a vision and being trapped inside it.

Technology needs a human context

Chad described a recurring failure pattern: an innovative technical solution appears without a clear problem domain or a real human context. The result may be well engineered, but it does not connect with the people who need it, use it, or approve the purchase.

Featured quote 1 — Innovation needs somewhere to land

“It was a a really innovative thing, a technology solution devoid of a context and a problem being solved.”

— Chad Cook

Chad Cook on LinkedIn · Echelix

Human-centered technology is not a design layer added at the end. It is the context that tells the technology where to go. The business, the workflow, the user, the buyer, and the larger organization all become part of the product question.

A feature is not yet a product

Early builders often start with a function people genuinely need. That is a good beginning, but it is not the whole product.

A product has to live inside a business. The user needs to be able to work with it. The buyer needs to understand the risk. The operations team needs to see the effect. The CFO needs to understand the cost. The CEO needs to see how it fits the larger direction.

The strongest roadmap is not the longest one. It is the one that understands the vertical slice of people connected to the problem.

The MVP is a focused slice, not a crowded future

Founders often carry the entire future of the product into the first version. New features accumulate because the vision is large and the resources are small.

Chad argued for a focused middle way: choose the core user and the core problem, then respect the other stakeholders who touch the decision without trying to become everything to everyone.

That is a different kind of ambition. It does not shrink the vision. It gives the vision a place to begin.

Customer conversations turn instinct into signal

Before writing a line of production code, Chad recommended talking to as many people as possible—not only the target audience, but people who live in the wider industry and understand the surrounding context.

The goal is not to collect polite agreement. It is to challenge confirmation bias. Talk to the people who might use the product, the people who influence the purchase, the people who may never use it but understand the workflow, and the people who will tell you it is not useful.

A prototype can develop in parallel with those conversations. The mistake is not building early. The mistake is treating the early build as proof that the production product is already defined.

The founder’s real test is discomfort

Feedback can feel like an attack when the product has become part of the builder’s identity. But the job is not to defend the first version. The job is to keep the purpose clear enough that the product can change without losing its reason for existing.

Featured quote 2 — Check the ego before the roadmap

“You really have to check your ego at the door and be comfortable with discomfort, right?”

— Chad Cook

Chad Cook on LinkedIn · Echelix

Discomfort is not necessarily a signal to retreat. Sometimes it is the signal that the founder has finally put the idea close enough to reality for another person to touch it.

Trust arrives before the mature product

An early-stage product is going to fall over. There will be bugs, missing features, and moments when the customer needs something the first release does not yet do.

That is why trust can be the first deliverable. When a founder listens, responds, asks the right questions, and stays honest about what the product can do, early customers have room to participate in the journey.

Customer relationships should not begin after the MVP is finished. The right early customers can help shape the MVP while also becoming referenceable partners who understand where the product is going.

Featured quote 3 — Bring the first client into the build

“I’d rather have a couple of key clients that are referenceable, that I’ve worked through the whole time, gotten their feedback.”

— Chad Cook

Chad Cook on LinkedIn · Echelix

That relationship changes the sales cycle. The customer is not waiting at the end of a tunnel. They are helping the founder discover what the product needs to become.

A product narrative connects the room

When multiple stakeholders are involved, the founder has to listen for the patterns that unite them. The CEO may care about efficiency. The daily user may care about eliminating manual work. Finance may care about cost and scalability. Operations may care about risk and continuity.

A product narrative is the thread that connects those concerns without pretending that each person wants the same thing. It makes the solution legible to the whole room while keeping the core user and problem in focus.

What the conversation makes possible

Building for people first does not mean moving slowly or asking permission forever. It means making contact with reality early enough that the roadmap can respond.

Talk to the people. Listen for signal. Let the product become more honest. Keep the vision, but give it a focused place to begin.

The ideal client profile is not a marketing exercise that sits beside the product. It is one of the first ways the product learns who it is.

Frequently asked questions about ICP and human-centered technology

  • Why define an ideal client profile before building a roadmap?

    An ideal client profile helps a founder focus the problem, understand the business context, and prioritize a useful product slice instead of accumulating features for an undefined audience.

  • How many customer conversations should a founder have?

    There is no universal number. Talk to as many relevant people as possible, including the target audience, adjacent industry participants, buyers, users, and people who may challenge your assumptions.

  • What makes an MVP too broad?

    An MVP becomes too broad when it tries to serve every stakeholder equally, carry the entire future roadmap, or solve many unrelated problems before one core user has a reliable outcome.

  • Why does trust matter before a product is mature?

    Early products will have limits. Trust gives customers room to participate, provide feedback, and stay engaged while the product becomes more capable.

  • How should founders handle rejection?

    Treat rejection as information. Ask what the person did not understand, what problem they are actually solving, and what would need to change for the product to become useful.

Enter the room

Before adding the next feature, find the next person to talk to. Ask what gets worse for them if your product does not exist, and listen long enough for the answer to surprise you.

Hear the full Create Your Own Gravity conversation and bring the idea into the room. The roadmap gets better when the people it is meant to serve are allowed to touch it.

Related Post